Personal trainer & software developer · 2025-06-01
For years, MyFitnessPal was the default answer to "how do I track my calories?" Then, in stages, it started paywalling features users had relied on for free. The barcode scanner. Detailed nutrient breakdowns. The food database search. One by one, core features moved behind a $19.99/month subscription.
That triggered a wave of people searching for alternatives — and in the process, many realized the paywall wasn't even the real problem.
This article covers the five genuine problems with MyFitnessPal (beyond pricing), an honest look at the best free alternatives in 2025, and a recommendation based on what you actually need.
When MFP was free, its model worked: give you a tool, earn from premium upsells. When premium became necessary to use basic features, the value exchange broke down. The barcode scanner — the most-used feature for millions of users — now requires Premium. At $19.99/month or $79.99/year, MFP costs more than many gym memberships for what is fundamentally a logging app.
MFP tells you if you hit your calorie goal. It does not tell you what to eat, how to structure your meals, or why you keep going over on weekends. You bring all the decisions; MFP just scores them.
For people who already understand nutrition and need a log, this is fine. For people who open MFP hoping it will help them figure out what to eat, it consistently fails to answer the actual question.
The biggest predictor of whether calorie tracking produces results is whether you keep doing it. MFP requires searching a database, selecting from dozens of conflicting entries, estimating quantities, and repeating for every ingredient of every meal, multiple times a day.
Research shows people underestimate their food intake by 20–40% even when actively trying to track accurately — and that most users abandon manual tracking within two weeks. The friction is the problem.
A 2025 study in Sociology Compass analyzed 95 fitness apps and found that many calorie counters inadvertently contribute to "weight stigma" by framing body weight as a moral issue. Apps reward hitting a number and penalize missing it, often without context. For users already struggling with their relationship to food, this framing causes real harm (1).
MFP has no workout programming. It imports steps and calories from Apple Health, but it does not tell you what to do in the gym, track your progressive overload, or connect your training to your nutritional targets. Anyone serious about body composition runs a second app alongside MFP — splitting tracking history and adding friction.
| App | Free tier | Photo logging | Workout tracking | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronometer | ✓ Full | ✗ | Basic | Micronutrient accuracy |
| Lose It! | ✓ Limited | ✓ | ✗ | Direct MFP replacement |
| MacroFactor | Trial only | ✓ | ✗ | Adaptive calorie targets |
| Noom | Trial only | ✗ | ✗ | Behavioral coaching |
| PonteFuerteAI | ✓ Full | ✓ AI-powered | ✓ + AI programs | Nutrition + training, free |
Best choice if micronutrient accuracy is your priority. Cronometer's food database is more carefully verified than MFP's user-contributed entries. The free tier is genuinely complete. Limitation: no AI features, no workout integration.
The closest direct replacement for MFP's core experience: cleaner interface, photo meal logging, solid food database. The free tier is more limited than MFP's was at its peak, but more functional than MFP free today. No workout tracking.
The technical standout: MacroFactor adjusts your calorie targets based on your actual weight trend rather than a static TDEE estimate. Genuinely smarter than MFP. Requires a subscription (~$13/month) and has no workout tracking.
PonteFuerteAI is the only option on this list that addresses problem #5 — the workout split. Instead of logging a meal by searching a database, you take a photo and AI handles it. Workout tracking with progressive overload lives in the same app as your nutrition log. Both free.
It is not the best option if micronutrient detail is critical (Cronometer wins there) or if you want MacroFactor's adaptive TDEE algorithm. But for most people switching from MFP who want something faster and free — and who also train — it covers both sides that MFP never did.
MFP has a free tier, but essential features — barcode scanner, detailed nutrition breakdowns, goal-setting — now require Premium at $19.99/month. The free version is significantly more limited than it was before 2022.
Cronometer for pure nutrition tracking accuracy. PonteFuerteAI if you also want workout tracking — it combines calorie and macro logging with AI strength programs in one free app.
PonteFuerteAI is the most complete free option that integrates both. AI photo scanning for meals plus progressive strength programs. No subscription required for core features.
For most users in 2025, yes. Lose It's free tier is more functional than MFP's current free experience, the interface is cleaner, and it includes photo logging. If you were a heavy database user on MFP, Lose It is the most frictionless switch.
Written by
Alberto MenéndezPersonal trainer · Software developer · Founder of PonteFuerteAI
Over 10 years of training experience across three continents. Certified personal trainer who coached clients in Spain, India, and Japan before building PonteFuerteAI — the all-in-one AI fitness app he always wished existed.
Read full story →Download PonteFuerte AI today and join thousands who are already achieving their goals with the help of our artificial intelligence.
▶Google PlayFree Personal Plan
Ibai Llanos lost 30kg, but how? We break down the science of his transformation and reveal the system you can use to get similar results, beyond just diet and exercise.
Read Article
Discover the best calorie counter app to lose weight between all the options on the App Store.
Read Article
Looking for a Hevy alternative in 2026? We compare the best apps for workout logging, AI plans, Apple Watch support, nutrition tracking, free programs, and strength progress.
Read Article